But this binding was adjourned in the Committee to the Assembly

Day tense tomorrow into perspective with the start of the Hansard of the Grenelle of the environment. In the morning, the wind industry will show and in the afternoon, it is the whole of the NGOs who have decided to "make noise for the environment" before the Assembly.

Benches also, the mood is far from the debates on the Bill said Grenelle 1 voted almost unanimously in 2008. Friday night, eve of the May 1, services were overwhelmed with more than 1,600 amendments to a text which has 250 articles. Problem: the text is examined according to the procedure of urgency and "legislative time programmed", set up by the reform of the rules of the Assembly. Is thirty hours planned until next Friday, deputies should in theory vote more than 50 amendments per hour! "We have the feeling that parliamentarians have partly forgotten the objectives of the reform of the debates," noted Bertrand Pancher, one of the four rapporteurs, before more than sixty hours of debate have already taken place in the presence of the Minister of ecology and his Secretaries of State. And to add that it will be difficult to find additional niches in the calendar already loaded assembly.

Discord on wind turbines

The decision to place the installation in the fields of wind turbines under the regime of classified installations and create regional wind (section 34) schema is a genuine arms of iron. For the UMP Deputy Patrick Ollier, it is a way to restore order, but for the industrialists in this sector, assimilation to a classified facility could change the image of wind turbines appear supposed risk and make the complex process. If it is unlikely that this measure be postponed, negotiations are underway to soften certain constraints on the minimum size of the established fields of wind turbines. If the Grenelle 2 remains in the State, "more than two thirds of wind turbine projects would be killed", said Greens Deputy Yves Cochet.

Rebutted green label

High extent of discussions, because it affects daily life, displaying carbon and environmental content on consumer products should gradually enter into force as of January 1, 2011. But this binding was adjourned in the Committee to the Assembly. The measure is not officially abandoned, but it will be first experienced a year. NGOs wish to date deadline is indicated, the companies, they fear a too complex mechanism. The decision to ban advertising outside built-up areas (article 15) is on the other hand approved, and the Act of forcing the advertisements of products subject to Community (in most household appliances) energy labelling to display prices and energy in the same way classification. Section 73, it requires the companies producing or important nanomaterials to declare to the authority. But no public information is provided.

Retreat on pesticides

Division by two of the use of pesticides by 2050 was part of the commitments made by the stakeholders to the Grenelle environment. But the provisions merely to better regulate the sale, the distribution free of charge, the application and the Council to the use of PPPs (Chapter 4, section 40). It is particularly intended to prohibit commercial advertising of pesticides for use of the public. The text stipulates that the Government must pass each year to the Parliament a report on the follow-up. In a context of serious agricultural crisis, the subject is complex. Farmers who will benefit by the Grenelle significant financial benefits when they produce renewable energy should put forward the report come to publish two parliamentary UMP holding the objective of the round table on pesticides to cause a too abrupt decrease in yields. On the other hand, the introduction of a tax for urban stormwater management sitting on the cadastrée water-repellent surface should simply local elected representatives and the amendments to display the recyclable nature of the products.